Drafting an Enforceable Florida Prenuptial Agreement

You probably have heard stories of people who had prenuptial agreements, thought their assets were secure, and yet, at the time of the divorce, had those prenuptial agreements thrown out by a judge for being unfair, overreaching, or being executed without sufficient financial disclosure.

To address the concerns of those who are thinking of getting a prenup, I recently wrote an article for The World of Collaborative Practice Magazine in which I discussed an essential process to utilize if you want an enforceable agreement:

I am seeing more and more clients – especially those who have previously experienced marriage and divorce – come to my office to learn about prenuptial (also known as premarital) agreements. Though they certainly do not go into the marriage planning to divorce, they know the statistics and want a prenuptial agreement to protect them and ensure that they do not get trapped in endless litigation later on.

At the same time, I find fewer and fewer family law attorneys who are willing to draft prenuptial agreements. Lawyers fear that, for whatever reason, the agreement could later be found to be unenforceable. Void prenuptial agreements create, at best, client dissatisfaction with the drafter and, at worst, risk of a malpractice suit.

Nevertheless, the demand for prenuptial agreements is increasing. How does an attorney minimize the risk that the agreement will be invalidated? The answer is close to our hearts, given that the interdisciplinary collaborative family law process is tailor-made for drafting prenuptial agreements.

In my jurisdiction of Florida, like many jurisdictions, there are two main methods to challenge the validity of a prenuptial agreement: the direct method and the indirect method. See Casto v. Casto, 508 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1987). In the direct method, the challenging spouse must establish that the agreement was reached under fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, misrepresentation, or overreaching. In the indirect method, the challenging spouse must show that the prenuptial agreement is blatantly unfair. Once the unfairness is established, then the prenuptial agreement will be invalidated unless the defending spouse can show that (i) he or she made full, frank disclosure of his or her financial situation or (ii) the other spouse had a general knowledge of the character and extent of the defending spouse’s assets and income.

With concerns related to the direct method, the use of a neutral forensic financial professional in the collaborative process helps to lessen the likelihood that the less wealthy fiancé will fall victim to fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Further, the utilization of a neutral facilitator/mental health professional in a collaborative process helps reduce the risk of duress, coercion, and overreaching, as part of the facilitator’s role is to identify power imbalances and ensure that each client’s concerns are addressed.

Similarly, in the indirect method of challenging the validity of a prenuptial agreement, the facilitator and the team dynamics of collaborative practice make it less likely that a party will enter into an “unfair” agreement. And, even if he or she does, the mere use of the neutral financial professional will bolster any argument by a defending spouse that (i) he or she was open in his or her finances and (ii) the challenging spouse was given the tools to understand the character and extent of assets and income.

The use of a neutral facilitator and neutral financial professional in a collaborative process may initially cost more than the traditional prenuptial negotiation process, and the wealthier fiancé is likely to have to pay for these additional upfront costs. However, the safeguards for the less wealthy fiancé that are built into the interdisciplinary collaborative process ultimately provide a judge cover for upholding a prenuptial agreement. This can save the wealthier fiancé tens of thousands of dollars (or more) in litigation costs in the event that a prospective marriage breaks down.

As laws regarding prenuptial agreements vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and as the family laws within states change frequently, there can be no guarantee that a prenuptial agreement will be found valid years or decades later. However, utilizing the interdisciplinary collaborative family law process in drafting a prenuptial agreement gives the agreement the best chance of surviving judicial scrutiny and remaining enforceable.

The same concept applies to postnuptial agreements, which are similar to prenuptial agreements except that they are entered into after a couple is already married.

If you have questions regarding prenuptial agreements and you wish to speak with a Florida family law attorney, schedule a consultation with The Law Firm of Adam B. Cordover, P.A., at (813) 443-0615 or fill out our contact form.

About these ads

About Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law

Adam B. Cordover is a collaborative family law attorney and managing shareholder of The Law Firm of Adam B. Cordover, P.A. To learn more about The Law Firm of Adam B. Cordover, P.A. or to schedule a consultation, call us at 813.443.0615 or visit us online at www.abcfamilylaw.com. Attorney Adam B. Cordover is admitted to the Florida Bar and the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida. His office is located at 412 East Madison Street, Suite 824, Tampa, Florida 33602.
This entry was posted in Collaborative Divorce, Family Law Explanation and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s